<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Catheter Ablation a Better Treatment Than Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation in Serious and Professional Athletes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/</link>
	<description>From StopAfib.org - For Afib Patients, By Afib Patients</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Dawson</title>
		<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-3213</link>
		<dc:creator>George Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 06:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/#comment-3213</guid>
		<description>If fibrosis and inflammation from mechanical overload on the atrium is the mechanism of afib in athletes - the recommendation to stop exercise is probably the better option.  The only exception would be is a safe threshold for exercise could be determined but I do not think that it has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If fibrosis and inflammation from mechanical overload on the atrium is the mechanism of afib in athletes &#8211; the recommendation to stop exercise is probably the better option.  The only exception would be is a safe threshold for exercise could be determined but I do not think that it has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Walter</title>
		<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/is-catheter-ablation-a-better-treatment-than-drugs-for-atrial-fibrillation-in-serious-and-professional-athletes/#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>Catheter ablation is risky and unproven: http://adventuresincardiology.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catheter ablation is risky and unproven: <a href="http://adventuresincardiology.com" rel="nofollow">http://adventuresincardiology.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: atrialfibrillationblog.com @ 2012-02-08 19:18:39 -->
