<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Post looks at how &#8220;atrial fibrillation is easy to find, but evidence on how best to treat it isn&#8217;t&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/washington-post-looks-at-how-atrial-fibrillation-is-easy-to-find-but-evidence-on-how-best-to-treat-it-isnt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/washington-post-looks-at-how-atrial-fibrillation-is-easy-to-find-but-evidence-on-how-best-to-treat-it-isnt/</link>
	<description>From StopAfib.org - For Afib Patients, By Afib Patients</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Washington Post looks at how "atrial fibrillation is easy to find, but evidence on how best to treat it isn't" &#124; Atrial Fibrillation Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/washington-post-looks-at-how-atrial-fibrillation-is-easy-to-find-but-evidence-on-how-best-to-treat-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-3111</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Washington Post looks at how "atrial fibrillation is easy to find, but evidence on how best to treat it isn't" &#124; Atrial Fibrillation Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/?p=267#comment-3111</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by StopAfib.org and Dr Alan Beckles, Dr Alan Beckles. Dr Alan Beckles said: RT @StopAfib: RT @stopafib Washington Post looks at how &quot;atrial fibrillation is easy to find, but evidence on how be.. http://bit.ly/9RyUU2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by StopAfib.org and Dr Alan Beckles, Dr Alan Beckles. Dr Alan Beckles said: RT @StopAfib: RT @stopafib Washington Post looks at how &quot;atrial fibrillation is easy to find, but evidence on how be.. <a href="http://bit.ly/9RyUU2" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9RyUU2</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitaly Piluiko</title>
		<link>http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/washington-post-looks-at-how-atrial-fibrillation-is-easy-to-find-but-evidence-on-how-best-to-treat-it-isnt/comment-page-1/#comment-3073</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaly Piluiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://atrialfibrillationblog.com/?p=267#comment-3073</guid>
		<description>It is a very fair and balanced presentation to the general public. Atrial fibrillation is not simple condition to treat. It is now well recognized that we should be more aggressive with it. It is also fair presenting the fact that catheter ablation is not always bring desirable result.
&quot;easy route&quot; Patient spend 6-8 hours in heart cath lab with the 5% risk of complications- stroke, tamponade, pulmonary vein stenosis, STROKE and DEATH, and as result- afib may come back. You need 2 procedures wilth double risk  to get to succes rate 60-70%
 &quot;dangerous route&quot;- most invasive option- full Maze procedure with conversion rate of more then 95% and risk of 1-2 % of stroke, 1-2% of bleeding and infection. Middle line incision in the chest and 3 days in the hospital.
There are other options- minimaze and hybrid procedures. They have not b een mentioned in this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a very fair and balanced presentation to the general public. Atrial fibrillation is not simple condition to treat. It is now well recognized that we should be more aggressive with it. It is also fair presenting the fact that catheter ablation is not always bring desirable result.<br />
&#8220;easy route&#8221; Patient spend 6-8 hours in heart cath lab with the 5% risk of complications- stroke, tamponade, pulmonary vein stenosis, STROKE and DEATH, and as result- afib may come back. You need 2 procedures wilth double risk  to get to succes rate 60-70%<br />
 &#8220;dangerous route&#8221;- most invasive option- full Maze procedure with conversion rate of more then 95% and risk of 1-2 % of stroke, 1-2% of bleeding and infection. Middle line incision in the chest and 3 days in the hospital.<br />
There are other options- minimaze and hybrid procedures. They have not b een mentioned in this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: atrialfibrillationblog.com @ 2012-05-23 11:53:21 -->
